National Resource Center for Academic Detailing [NaRCAD]
NARCAD
  • About
    • Why We Matter
    • Testimonials
    • Our Team
    • Contact Us
  • Tools & Resources
    • AD Core Toolkits >
      • Inclusivity Toolkit
      • Opioid Safety Toolkit
      • HIV Prevention Toolkit
      • E-Detailing Toolkit
      • Materials Toolkit
    • AD Literature Archives
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Series
    • E-Detailing Webinars
    • E-Detailing Roundtables
  • Blog & E-News
    • Best Practices Blog
    • E-Newsletter
  • Community
    • Discussion Forum
    • Peer Connection Program
    • Detailing Partners
  • EVENTS
    • Training Series
    • CONFERENCE SERIES
    • AD Summit Series
    • Present at NaRCAD2023
    • THE CONFERENCE HUB
  • About
    • Why We Matter
    • Testimonials
    • Our Team
    • Contact Us
  • Tools & Resources
    • AD Core Toolkits >
      • Inclusivity Toolkit
      • Opioid Safety Toolkit
      • HIV Prevention Toolkit
      • E-Detailing Toolkit
      • Materials Toolkit
    • AD Literature Archives
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Series
    • E-Detailing Webinars
    • E-Detailing Roundtables
  • Blog & E-News
    • Best Practices Blog
    • E-Newsletter
  • Community
    • Discussion Forum
    • Peer Connection Program
    • Detailing Partners
  • EVENTS
    • Training Series
    • CONFERENCE SERIES
    • AD Summit Series
    • Present at NaRCAD2023
    • THE CONFERENCE HUB

The DETAILS BLOG

Capturing Stories from the Field: Reflections, Challenges, & Best Practices

Why 1:1 Interactivity Matters

11/9/2015

 
Picture
Jerry Avorn, MD, NaRCAD Co-Director

Tags: Detailing Visits, Jerry Avorn, Training
​
Often, in discussing academic detailing programs with current or potential sponsors, the question comes up: “Wouldn’t it be cheaper just to deliver the message to a whole group of clinicians at once, instead of the much more cumbersome process of talking to prescribers one at a time?”  Sure, it would be cheaper.

So would just mailing (or e-mailing) memos to people telling them what to do, or requiring time-consuming groveling on 1-800-DROP-DEAD prior authorization numbers before a costly resource can be ordered. The problem is that cheaper solutions often don’t work, or don’t work well. We have decades of proof that putting health care professionals together in a darkened auditorium and subjecting them to a PowerPoint Tolerance Test does not reliably change behavior.

The main reason that academic detailing relies on one-on-one interactive communication is that it is the best way for the outreach educator to accomplish several key goals:
  • Understand the clinician’s current practices, attitudes, and beliefs;
  • Tailor a message specifically targeted to that person’s educational needs, and where he or she is coming from;
  • Keep the learner engaged. (It’s harder to read e-mails, gaze out the window, or doze off if you’re in the middle of a conversation.)
​
Well-trained academic detailers understand this, and they use the interactivity to craft a real-time, care-improvement message that best addresses the learning needs (and attitudes and biases!) of the person they’re visiting. Less competent academic detailers force their “targets” to sit still while they administer a canned micro-lecture monologue, which works poorly.  They may feel they “got through all the points” they wanted to cover, but if there was no interactivity, no conversation, then the person they were talking at might as well have been falling asleep in a darkened amphitheatre.

We know this is the case from decades of experience and scores of randomized controlled trials. We also know, perhaps most compellingly, that when the drug industry wants to change what we know and about its products, it sends people to our offices to talk with us—it doesn’t rely only on the less expensive modalities of mailings, e-messages, and sponsored lectures.

So the next time someone suggests that it might be more inexpensive to just gather prescribers into a big room and have someone talk at them for an hour, agree with them. Then point out that it’s also less time-intensive to scarf down a Big Mac than eat a real meal, shoot off a series of emoticons rather than a personalized note, or listen to a ring tone of a Beethoven sonata rather than hear it performed by musicians. Cheaper isn’t everything.


Comments are closed.

    Highlighting Best Practices

    We highlight what's working in clinical education through interviews, features, event recaps, and guest blogs, offering clinical educators the chance to share successes and lessons learned from around the country & beyond.

    Search Archives
    by Topic:

    All
    Autism
    Cancer
    Cardiovascular Health
    Chronic Illness
    CME
    Conference
    COVID 19
    Data
    Deprescribing
    Detailing Visits
    Diabetes
    Director's Letter
    E Detailing
    Elderly Care
    Evaluation
    Evidence Based Medicine
    Expert Trainer Insight Series
    Harm Reduction
    Health Disparities
    Health Policy
    Hepatitis C
    HIV/AIDS
    International
    Jerry Avorn
    LOOPR
    Materials Development
    Medications
    Mental Health
    Obesity
    Opioid Safety
    Pediatrics
    Practice Facilitation
    PrEP
    Primary Care
    Program Management
    Rural AD Programs
    Sexual Health
    Smoking Cessation
    Stigma
    Substance Use
    Sustainability
    Training
    Vaccinations

    RSS Feed


​NaRCAD is a program of the Boston Medical Center, founded at the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics [DoPE], at Brigham & Women's Hospital.

​Privacy Notice
Proudly powered by Weebly