National Resource Center for Academic Detailing [NaRCAD]
NARCAD
  • About
    • Why We Matter
    • Testimonials
    • Our Team
    • Contact Us
  • Tools & Resources
    • AD Core Toolkits >
      • Inclusivity Toolkit
      • Opioid Safety Toolkit
      • HIV Prevention Toolkit
      • E-Detailing Toolkit
      • Materials Toolkit
    • AD Literature Archives
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Series
    • E-Detailing Webinars
    • E-Detailing Roundtables
  • Blog & E-News
    • Best Practices Blog
    • E-Newsletter
  • Community
    • Discussion Forum
    • Peer Connection Program
    • Detailing Partners
  • EVENTS
    • Training Series
    • CONFERENCE SERIES
    • AD Summit Series
    • Present at NaRCAD2023
    • THE CONFERENCE HUB
  • About
    • Why We Matter
    • Testimonials
    • Our Team
    • Contact Us
  • Tools & Resources
    • AD Core Toolkits >
      • Inclusivity Toolkit
      • Opioid Safety Toolkit
      • HIV Prevention Toolkit
      • E-Detailing Toolkit
      • Materials Toolkit
    • AD Literature Archives
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Series
    • E-Detailing Webinars
    • E-Detailing Roundtables
  • Blog & E-News
    • Best Practices Blog
    • E-Newsletter
  • Community
    • Discussion Forum
    • Peer Connection Program
    • Detailing Partners
  • EVENTS
    • Training Series
    • CONFERENCE SERIES
    • AD Summit Series
    • Present at NaRCAD2023
    • THE CONFERENCE HUB

The DETAILS BLOG

Capturing Stories from the Field: Reflections, Challenges, & Best Practices

Who Do You Trust?

10/13/2017

0 Comments

 
Navigating a Disorienting Healthcare Landscape | Jerry Avorn, MD, NaRCAD Co-Director
Picture
Tags: Evidence-Based Medicine, Health Policy, Jerry Avorn, Medications

​First, about the grammar. Readers under 65 will be forgiven if they never heard of the daytime television quiz show “Who Do You Trust?” that aired from 1957 to 1963. In it, male contestants were asked if they wanted to answer a question or whether they ‘trusted’ their wife to do so. Concerns by snarky little kids like me that it really should have been “Whom Do You Trust?” did not diminish the show’s popular appeal. Gender issues went totally undiscussed.

​All grown up now and confronting a changing health care landscape, that still-sometimes-snarky little boy often wonders, as do many of my clinician colleagues, who can be trusted in the world of medical information, especially in relation to prescription drugs. Gone are the simpler times when one had to worry only about whether the drug ads and sales reps were really presenting a balanced picture of all the evidence, which was a hard enough challenge. 
Picture
We now know that we also have to be concerned about off-label marketing campaigns offering impermissible (and often downright deceptive) statements about efficacy –  excesses for which over $16 billion has now been paid to state attorneys general in legal penalties and settlements.

​As I’ve noted previously, the courts and the FDA are also moving toward much more permissiveness with company claims about efficacy and safety. And in last year’s 21st Century Cures Act, Congress instructed the FDA to be more open to accepting lower standards for drug approval.

Picture
Then there are newer sources of information whose trustworthiness is not always clear. More and more, this includes the prescription benefit management (PBM) companies, which seem to be holding on to an ever-larger fraction of the funds flowing through their rich payment pipelines, yet provide little transparency about who gets to keep what rebate dollars, and for what reason. Once billed as cost-savings protectors and comparative effectiveness gurus, the PBMs are under increasing scrutiny, and asked to make their financial data transparent and to clarify just who’s saving what for whom (or is it ‘for who?’).

Picture
Nor can we always be sure what angle the payors are playing. Why is Drug A on the formulary, but not its sibling Drug B? It may be an astute purchasing decision, or just the result of a rebate hack. And how much are prior authorization rules and growing co-payments designed to promote evidence-based care, or other less worthy goals? Even clinical guidelines put out by third parties vary from the most rigorous to pretty sketchy. 

Picture
This leads to one good answer to the ungrammatical question in our title. With these galloping changes in an ever-more marketplace-oriented health care system, every prescriber needs and deserves a smart, superbly informed colleague to rely on to get the best possible syntheses of the clinical evidence – someone who has no other agenda or motivation other than getting the facts right and transmitting them faithfully.

​Each year, we can take less comfort in counting only on FDA-approved indications, or payor policies, or PBM choices, or advertised claims. The more compromised each of these sources becomes, the more we’ll need ‘honest brokers’ like well-trained and un-conflicted academic detailers, whose only duty is to communicate the fairest evidence summaries as effectively as possible. Like lightweight clothing in an era of global warming, it’s a need that’s only going to increase.

Thoughts? Reactions? Sound off below.

Picture
Biography.
Jerry Avorn, MD,​ Co-Director, NaRCAD
Dr. Avorn is Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Chief of the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics (DoPE) at Brigham & Women's Hospital. A general internist and drug epidemiologist,  he pioneered the concept of academic detailing and is recognized internationally as a leading expert on this topic and on optimal medication use. ​Read more.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Highlighting Best Practices

    We highlight what's working in clinical education through interviews, features, event recaps, and guest blogs, offering clinical educators the chance to share successes and lessons learned from around the country & beyond.

    Search Archives
    by Topic:

    All
    Autism
    Cancer
    Cardiovascular Health
    Chronic Illness
    CME
    Conference
    COVID 19
    Data
    Deprescribing
    Detailing Visits
    Diabetes
    Director's Letter
    E Detailing
    Elderly Care
    Evaluation
    Evidence Based Medicine
    Expert Trainer Insight Series
    Harm Reduction
    Health Disparities
    Health Policy
    Hepatitis C
    HIV/AIDS
    International
    Jerry Avorn
    LOOPR
    Materials Development
    Medications
    Mental Health
    Obesity
    Opioid Safety
    Pediatrics
    Practice Facilitation
    PrEP
    Primary Care
    Program Management
    Rural AD Programs
    Sexual Health
    Smoking Cessation
    Stigma
    Substance Use
    Sustainability
    Training
    Vaccinations

    RSS Feed


​NaRCAD is a program of the Boston Medical Center, founded at the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics [DoPE], at Brigham & Women's Hospital.

​Privacy Notice
Proudly powered by Weebly